28 Feb It’s Past Time to Stop Calling Evolution “Science”
The theory of evolution is just that – a theory. However, evolutionists, for decades, have been presenting it, in literature, in media, in elementary, secondary, and post-secondary schools – everywhere – as fact, as scientific fact. Yet it isn’t. It is simply a theory. Always has been, always will be.
It cannot be proven, people can only analyze the data and draw conclusions. A big part of the evolutionary theory has been regarding the origin of all that we see, and that has been explained by the “big bang theory”.
Creationism has been mocked and dismissed in all realms as myth, nonsense, and fables. Whereas the theories around evolution are constantly presented as fact and scientific, even when the word “theory” is tacked on, such as the big bang theory as it is widely accepted as the reality of how the universe began.
The big bang theory explains that the universe began about 13.7 billion years ago. Some chemicals were very hot and very compact and then began to expand and cool, literally the expansion of space, not matter expanding in space, but space and time expanding together.
This theory, if true, would mean that the further out we could see, the further back in time we would be looking, and there – where things are closer to the origin of the big bang, closer to the birth of the universe – we would see solar systems that were not as fully developed and we would see smaller systems. “We expected only to find tiny, young, baby galaxies at this point in time”. This is necessary, if one believes the big bang theory is actually true.
However, with the abilities to see further into space with the new James Webb telescope, which is designed to give us a further glimpse out (back in time, closer to the origin of the universe), they can see back to what they postulate is about 350 million years from the beginning, the bang.
What they are seeing does not fit with their theories of the big bang. In fact, they directly and massively contradict all those theories. They are seeing, very close to their big bang (the beginning in their belief), massive galaxies and systems, some very orderly and structured, and many way bigger stars (than our sun) and galaxies (on par with our Milky Way Galaxy), “harboring tens to hundreds of billions of sun-sized stars worth of mass, on par with the Milky Way.”
This should not be, according to their theory.
They used words to describe how they are responding to this such as “It’s bananas”, or “We were mind-blown, kind of incredulous”, calling what they are finding as “universe breakers” (although I would rename these “theory breakers” or “evolution breakers”). They write, “You just don’t expect the early universe to be able to organize itself that quickly.
These galaxies should not have had time to form.” They say what they are finding may, “rewrite astronomy textbooks.”
Here is the reason I write this news article in the words of one of the scientists, “The revelation that massive galaxy formation began extremely early in the history of the universe upends what many of us had thought was settled science.”
“Settled science” is anything but settled when it comes to the topic of origins, however, it has been taught and presented for decades as scientific FACT and any who even question it are ridiculed and dismissed, mocked and insulted as naïve, foolish, ill-informed, and ignorant.
Our children, throughout their educational years, if in any public system, are inundated with mocking of Creationism and indoctrination into the science (is actually pseudo-science) of evolution.
“Leja explained that the galaxies the team discovered are so massive that they are in tension with 99% percent of models for cosmology.” “It turns out we found something so unexpected it actually creates problems for science. It calls the whole picture of early galaxy formation into question.” Actually it presents no problem to true science, but to the façade they have called science, when it deals with origins, well, this deals a death blow, yet to admit the real outcome of their new data, is a thing that they will not do, for underlying their theories and so called “science” has always been their presuppositions. They actually start with a presupposition that there is no God, no Creator, no Designer, everything had to exist by accident and chance. Why? Because they worship the creation rather than the Creator (Romans 1:25), and suppress the truth in unrighteousness (Romans 1:18). In reality these very brilliant scientists actually fall right into Romans 1:21, “For although they knew God, they did not honour him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.”
Here are just a few of the articles about these new findings and the struggle evolutionists are having believing them: